With cyber safety protocols, we are often caught in the middle between all that we have at our disposal to protect our accounts and a wish to have an enjoyable user experience that doesn\u2019t involve too much hassle. So, what brings the optimal balance between security and comfort?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This article compares two-factor verification and a multi-factor verification or 2FA vs. MFA to see whether one is a better solution when your security is at stake. These two methods are commonly used on the majority of today\u2019s devices, and in this article we examine them both and show their differences. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Authentication is a process through which the security system determines if the person who is trying to log in is in fact the owner of the account. In other words, the system needs a way to tell if the person who is logging in is the owner or a hacker trying to break into an account<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n To discern this, the security system needs some information as proof of the owner\u2019s identity. These pieces of information are called authentication factors<\/strong>. Both MFA and 2FA methods rely on authentication factors as the integral part of their defense.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Multi-factor authentication (MFA) is an authentication method that requires two or more factors of authentication, while two-factor authentication (2FA) is an authentication method that requires exactly two factors of authentication<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n It is clear that two-factor authentication is practically a subset of multi-factor authentication, as it involves two factors and thus can be considered a MFA. In this instance, when there are just two factors employed in the MFA, the 2FA and MFA present the equal level of protection. <\/p>\n\n\n\n However, the reverse can\u2019t be said – not all multi-factor authentication methods are two-factor authentication methods<\/strong>, as they can have more than two factors involved. If a security protocol is advertised as MFA, you should check how many factors it includes in its authentication process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Does this mean that the 2FA vs. multi-factor authentication race has a definite winner? Not exactly. The 2FA is still a highly secure protocol, especially depending on the factors that your system uses<\/strong> and it requires less hustle when logging in. Also, enabling multi-factor authentication doesn\u2019t automatically mean a stronger security protocol.<\/p>\n\n\n\n At the same time, using a 2FA doesn\u2019t necessarily mean a weak cybersecurity protocol, as long as you choose two strong factors. The overall security comes down to the strength of authentication factors involved.<\/p>\n\n\n\n There are many different authentication factors that your devices might require, like a password, fingerprint scan, your current location or a SMS notification. They can be divided into groups, including but not limited to: <\/p>\n\n\n\n The most common authentication factor is the knowledge factor. If you have an email account that only needs your password to log in, that would be a perfect example of a single factor authentication defense<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n And if the hackers are good at anything it\u2019s breaking into people\u2019s passwords. Phishing attacks, brute force attacks, password spraying attacks, credential stuffing, are all aimed at breaking your passwords.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So when it comes to MFA vs. 2FA, in comparison to single factor authentication there is hardly any difference, as the second layer proves to be crucial in many cases, and they are both superior to single factor authentication. <\/p>\n\n\n\n If you have a second layer of defense such as a push notification that sends a code to your phone that the hackers can\u2019t gain access to, you\u2019re increasing your security as this additional step will give you the opportunity to change the password in time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n More factors usually means better security, as it gives you more layers of defense that the hackers have to break. This means you have more time to react and get your defenses back up. <\/p>\n\n\n\n For example, if someone gets your bank card and PIN but there is a biometric factor in the protocol, like a fingerprint verification, they won\u2019t be able to get into your account. Instead, you\u2019ll get a notification from the bank that there was an unauthorized attempt to log in to your account, and you\u2019ll be able to report it and stop the breach before there is any real damage done.<\/p>\n\n\n\n But there are other MFA advantages as well. Devices with more authentication factors can bring you a better user experience. Some accounts are set up so that if your location is confirmed, you don\u2019t have to go through any other verification steps. <\/p>\n\n\n\n However, for those critical accounts, like your bank accounts, you would want to enable multi-factor authentication and use all the multiple authentication factors that your device provides.<\/p>\n\n\n\nWhat Is the Difference Between MFA and 2FA?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
What Are The Authentication Factors?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
<\/li>\n\n\n\n
<\/li>\n\n\n\nDo You Need More Than One Factor?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
When Is MFA Better?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
When Is 2FA Better?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n